Changes between Version 9 and Version 10 of ExampleWrapperScilab

Show
Ignore:
Timestamp:
07/23/09 16:32:13 (14 months ago)
Author:
regis.lebrun@…
Comment:

Added the checking step

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • ExampleWrapperScilab

    v9 v10  
    562562 * The wrapper will be seen by OpenTURNS automatically, as it was configured to be placed in a standard folder, where OpenTURNS checks by default the presence of wrappers. 
    563563 
     564== Checking the wrapper == 
     565 
     566The ''test_ScilabWrapper.py'' script should give: 
     567{{{ 
     568python test_ScilabWrapper.py 
     569Welcome to OpenTURNS version 0.13.1 
     570USR - (func_createState_call_scilab) My message is here 
     571f =  class=NumericalMathFunction name=ScilabWrapper implementation=class=NumericalMathFunctionImplementation name=ScilabWrapper description=[R,F,G] evaluationImplementation=class=ComputedNumericalMathEvaluationImplementation name=ScilabWrapper gradientImplementation=class=CenteredFiniteDifferenceGradient name=Unnamed epsilon=class=NumericalPoint name=Unnamed dimension=2 implementation=class=NumericalPointImplementation name=Unnamed dimension=2 values=[0.00316228,0.00316228] evaluation=class=ComputedNumericalMathEvaluationImplementation name=ScilabWrapper hessianImplementation=class=CenteredFiniteDifferenceHessian name=Unnamed epsilon=class=NumericalPoint name=Unnamed dimension=2 implementation=class=NumericalPointImplementation name=Unnamed dimension=2 values=[0.01,0.01] evaluation=class=ComputedNumericalMathEvaluationImplementation name=ScilabWrapper 
     572inP =  [10,20] 
     573outP =  [9.93634] 
     574}}} 
     575 
    564576== Running a stochastic analysis using the wrapper == 
    565577